theoretical-computer-science / Differential privacy

Klopp-Zadik Question on Polynomial-Time Node-Private Recovery

Klopp and Zadik gave an exponential-time node-private algorithm for exact community recovery in stochastic block models and asked whether a polynomial-time algorithm could match it. One can: a Lipschitz surrogate for the penalized likelihood plus an accept-reject sampler gives a high-probability polynomial-time node-private algorithm that nearly matches the exponential-time guarantee.

12Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

theoretical-computer-scienceJul 10, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: unreviewed

Klopp-Zadik Question on Polynomial-Time Node-Private Recovery

Prior state unknownproved

Klopp and Zadik gave an exponential-time node-private algorithm for exact community recovery in stochastic block models and asked whether a polynomial-time algorithm could match it. One can: a Lipschitz surrogate for the penalized likelihood plus an accept-reject sampler gives a high-probability polynomial-time node-private algorithm that nearly matches the exponential-time guarantee.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Klopp and Zadik gave an exponential-time node-private algorithm for exact community recovery in stochastic block models and asked whether a polynomial-time algorithm could match it. One can: a Lipschitz surrogate for the penalized likelihood plus an accept-reject sampler gives a high-probability polynomial-time node-private algorithm that nearly matches the exponential-time guarantee.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.