combinatorics / Matroid theory

Log-Concavity of Flats of Matroids

Mason conjectured the following: let $M$ be a matroid of rank $r$, and let $W_i$ denote the number of flats of $M$ of rank $i$. Is it true that for all $1 \leq i \leq r - 1$, we have $W_i^2 \geq W_{i + 1}W_{i - 1}$? This is false; a counterexample is given by a graphic matroid whose graph is a generalized theta graph with $79$ edges.

30Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsJul 2, 2026Significance 30/100Registry: unreviewed

Log-Concavity of Flats of Matroids

Prior state unknowndisproved

Refuting log-concavity of the flat counts is weaker than refuting their unimodality, since log-concavity is the stronger property. A counterexample to unimodality followed three weeks later and is tracked separately as Rota's Unimodality Conjecture for Matroid Flats; this paper came first.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Mason conjectured the following: let $M$ be a matroid of rank $r$, and let $W_i$ denote the number of flats of $M$ of rank $i$. Is it true that for all $1 \leq i \leq r - 1$, we have $W_i^2 \geq W_{i + 1}W_{i - 1}$? This is false; a counterexample is given by a graphic matroid whose graph is a generalized theta graph with $79$ edges.

Refuting log-concavity of the flat counts is weaker than refuting their unimodality, since log-concavity is the stronger property. A counterexample to unimodality followed three weeks later and is tracked separately as Rota's Unimodality Conjecture for Matroid Flats; this paper came first.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.