algorithms-optimization / Bin packing and cutting stock; configuration LP integrality gap

The Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture for bin packing (Scheithauer-Terno)

Theorem 1.1: for every integer c≥0c\ge0 there are a finite rational instance II, every item larger than 1/61/6 (so at most five items per bin), and an integer BB with LP(I)=BLP(I)=B and OPT(I)>B+cOPT(I)>B+c; the same LP value holds for the stronger formulation whose patterns are subsets of individual item copies. So the additive integrality gap of the configuration LP is unbounded and the Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture is false. Not shown: a gap growing like log⁡OPT\log OPT in the instance size, matching the Hoberg-Rothvoss upper bound; the paper says it obtains no such lower bound.

32Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

algorithms-optimizationSep 24, 2026Significance 32/100Registry: lean checked

The Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture for bin packing (Scheithauer-Terno)

Prior state unknown→disproved

Theorem 1.1: for every integer c≥0c\ge0 there are a finite rational instance II, every item larger than 1/61/6 (so at most five items per bin), and an integer BB with LP(I)=BLP(I)=B and OPT(I)>B+cOPT(I)>B+c; the same LP value holds for the stronger formulation whose patterns are subsets of individual item copies. So the additive integrality gap of the configuration LP is unbounded and the Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture is…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: for every integer c≥0c\ge0 there are a finite rational instance II, every item larger than 1/61/6 (so at most five items per bin), and an integer BB with LP(I)=BLP(I)=B and OPT(I)>B+cOPT(I)>B+c; the same LP value holds for the stronger formulation whose patterns are subsets of individual item copies. So the additive integrality gap of the configuration LP is unbounded and the Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture is false. Not shown: a gap growing like log⁡OPT\log OPT in the instance size, matching the Hoberg-Rothvoss upper bound; the paper says it obtains no such lower bound.

Theorem 1.1: for every integer c≥0c\ge0 there are a finite rational instance II, every item larger than 1/61/6 (so at most five items per bin), and an integer BB with LP(I)=BLP(I)=B and OPT(I)>B+cOPT(I)>B+c; the same LP value holds for the stronger formulation whose patterns are subsets of individual item copies. So the additive integrality gap of the configuration LP is unbounded and the Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture is false. Not shown: a gap growing like log⁡OPT\log OPT in the instance size, matching the Hoberg-Rothvoss upper bound; the paper says it obtains no such lower bound.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

The Modified Integer Round-Up Conjecture for bin packing (Scheithauer-Terno) — Mathematical Frontier Network