geometry-topology / Kahler geometry; several complex variables

Wu's bounded-domain question for negatively pinched Kahler manifolds: is a complete simply connected Kahler manifold with pinched negative curvature biholomorphic to a bounded domain?

Theorem 1.1: there is a contractible domain M⊂C3M\subset\mathbb C^3 (a Hartogs-type disc bundle over the unit ball of C2\mathbb C^2) with a smooth complete Kahler metric whose real sectional curvatures satisfy −B≤K≤−A<0-B\le K\le -A<0, such that no bounded holomorphic map M→C3M\to\mathbb C^3 has nowhere-vanishing Jacobian; hence MM is not biholomorphic to any bounded domain. This disproves Wu-Yau Conjecture 4.3 and gives a negative answer under the hypotheses of Wu's 1967 question. It does not show absence of bounded holomorphic functions (two base coordinates are bounded), and the example is Stein. Only complex dimension three is constructed.

36Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

geometry-topologySep 25, 2026Significance 36/100Registry: lean checked

Wu's bounded-domain question for negatively pinched Kahler manifolds: is a complete simply connected Kahler manifold with pinched negative curvature biholomorphic to a bounded domain?

Prior state unknown→disproved

Theorem 1.1: there is a contractible domain M⊂C3M\subset\mathbb C^3 (a Hartogs-type disc bundle over the unit ball of C2\mathbb C^2) with a smooth complete Kahler metric whose real sectional curvatures satisfy −B≤K≤−A<0-B\le K\le -A<0, such that no bounded holomorphic map M→C3M\to\mathbb C^3 has nowhere-vanishing Jacobian; hence MM is not biholomorphic to any bounded domain. This disproves Wu-Yau Conjecture 4.3 and gives a ne…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: there is a contractible domain M⊂C3M\subset\mathbb C^3 (a Hartogs-type disc bundle over the unit ball of C2\mathbb C^2) with a smooth complete Kahler metric whose real sectional curvatures satisfy −B≤K≤−A<0-B\le K\le -A<0, such that no bounded holomorphic map M→C3M\to\mathbb C^3 has nowhere-vanishing Jacobian; hence MM is not biholomorphic to any bounded domain. This disproves Wu-Yau Conjecture 4.3 and gives a negative answer under the hypotheses of Wu's 1967 question. It does not show absence of bounded holomorphic functions (two base coordinates are bounded), and the example is Stein. Only complex dimension three is constructed.

Theorem 1.1: there is a contractible domain M⊂C3M\subset\mathbb C^3 (a Hartogs-type disc bundle over the unit ball of C2\mathbb C^2) with a smooth complete Kahler metric whose real sectional curvatures satisfy −B≤K≤−A<0-B\le K\le -A<0, such that no bounded holomorphic map M→C3M\to\mathbb C^3 has nowhere-vanishing Jacobian; hence MM is not biholomorphic to any bounded domain. This disproves Wu-Yau Conjecture 4.3 and gives a negative answer under the hypotheses of Wu's 1967 question. It does not show absence of bounded holomorphic functions (two base coordinates are bounded), and the example is Stein. Only complex dimension three is constructed.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record