geometry-topology / Low-dimensional topology: Dehn surgery on knots

The purely cosmetic surgery conjecture for knots in the three-sphere

Theorem 1.1: for every nontrivial smooth knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 and all r,s∈Q∪{∞}r,s\in\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\}, an orientation-preserving homeomorphism Sr3(K)≅Ss3(K)S^3_r(K)\cong S^3_s(K) forces r=sr=s; the homeomorphism need not preserve the surgery core or the knot exterior. After the cited reduction to g(K)=2g(K)=2 and slopes ±2\pm 2, the paper derives a contradiction by comparing a nonzero integer instanton count Ω\Omega on a parameterized cobordism with a one-dimensional count of solutions with spinors whose boundary would force 2ηΩ=02^\eta\Omega=0. It does not address chirally cosmetic (orientation-reversing) surgeries or knots in other three-manifolds.

45Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

geometry-topologySep 23, 2026Significance 45/100Registry: unreviewed

The purely cosmetic surgery conjecture for knots in the three-sphere

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1.1: for every nontrivial smooth knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 and all r,s∈Q∪{∞}r,s\in\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\}, an orientation-preserving homeomorphism Sr3(K)≅Ss3(K)S^3_r(K)\cong S^3_s(K) forces r=sr=s; the homeomorphism need not preserve the surgery core or the knot exterior. After the cited reduction to g(K)=2g(K)=2 and slopes ±2\pm 2, the paper derives a contradiction by comparing a nonzero integer instanton count Ω\Omega on a parameter…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: for every nontrivial smooth knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 and all r,s∈Q∪{∞}r,s\in\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\}, an orientation-preserving homeomorphism Sr3(K)≅Ss3(K)S^3_r(K)\cong S^3_s(K) forces r=sr=s; the homeomorphism need not preserve the surgery core or the knot exterior. After the cited reduction to g(K)=2g(K)=2 and slopes ±2\pm 2, the paper derives a contradiction by comparing a nonzero integer instanton count Ω\Omega on a parameterized cobordism with a one-dimensional count of solutions with spinors whose boundary would force 2ηΩ=02^\eta\Omega=0. It does not address chirally cosmetic (orientation-reversing) surgeries or knots in other three-manifolds.

Theorem 1.1: for every nontrivial smooth knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 and all r,s∈Q∪{∞}r,s\in\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\}, an orientation-preserving homeomorphism Sr3(K)≅Ss3(K)S^3_r(K)\cong S^3_s(K) forces r=sr=s; the homeomorphism need not preserve the surgery core or the knot exterior. After the cited reduction to g(K)=2g(K)=2 and slopes ±2\pm 2, the paper derives a contradiction by comparing a nonzero integer instanton count Ω\Omega on a parameterized cobordism with a one-dimensional count of solutions with spinors whose boundary would force 2ηΩ=02^\eta\Omega=0. It does not address chirally cosmetic (orientation-reversing) surgeries or knots in other three-manifolds.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record