analysis / Ergodic theory; mixing and joinings

Rokhlin's multiple-mixing problem for a single transformation

Theorem 1.1: every invertible mixing probability-preserving transformation, on an arbitrary probability space with no standardness assumption, is mixing of every finite order. The proof assumes a least failing order kk, reduces to a zero-entropy finite-alphabet process, builds saturated (sated) array extensions of the limit joinings, extracts orthogonal lines of modulus-one functions from row and column conditional-expectation operators, and cancels against them. Corollary: the same for mixing endomorphisms and for mixing flows whose Koopman operators are strongly continuous on L1L^1. Not shown: anything for Zd\mathbb Z^d or other group actions (where Ledrappier's example shows the analogue fails), or any rate of convergence.

62Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

analysisSep 23, 2026Significance 62/100Registry: lean checked

Rokhlin's multiple-mixing problem for a single transformation

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1.1: every invertible mixing probability-preserving transformation, on an arbitrary probability space with no standardness assumption, is mixing of every finite order. The proof assumes a least failing order kk, reduces to a zero-entropy finite-alphabet process, builds saturated (sated) array extensions of the limit joinings, extracts orthogonal lines of modulus-one functions from row and column conditional…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: every invertible mixing probability-preserving transformation, on an arbitrary probability space with no standardness assumption, is mixing of every finite order. The proof assumes a least failing order kk, reduces to a zero-entropy finite-alphabet process, builds saturated (sated) array extensions of the limit joinings, extracts orthogonal lines of modulus-one functions from row and column conditional-expectation operators, and cancels against them. Corollary: the same for mixing endomorphisms and for mixing flows whose Koopman operators are strongly continuous on L1L^1. Not shown: anything for Zd\mathbb Z^d or other group actions (where Ledrappier's example shows the analogue fails), or any rate of convergence.

Theorem 1.1: every invertible mixing probability-preserving transformation, on an arbitrary probability space with no standardness assumption, is mixing of every finite order. The proof assumes a least failing order kk, reduces to a zero-entropy finite-alphabet process, builds saturated (sated) array extensions of the limit joinings, extracts orthogonal lines of modulus-one functions from row and column conditional-expectation operators, and cancels against them. Corollary: the same for mixing endomorphisms and for mixing flows whose Koopman operators are strongly continuous on L1L^1. Not shown: anything for Zd\mathbb Z^d or other group actions (where Ledrappier's example shows the analogue fails), or any rate of convergence.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

Rokhlin's multiple-mixing problem for a single transformation — Mathematical Frontier Network