combinatorics / Tournament theory

Score-Determined Induced Tournament Statistics: an All-Orders Classification

A tournament orients every pair in a round-robin (winner → loser). The score sequence is the sorted win-count list. Reversing a directed 3-cycle never changes scores, so score-equivalent tournaments can look structurally different. Question: Which linear combinations of induced k-subtournament type-counts are score-determined — identical across all tournaments sharing a score sequence, at any host size? Answer: Exactly the linear combinations of degree-multiplicity counts $m_0,\dots,m_{k−1}$, where $m_r$ counts how many of the $k$ chosen vertices have exactly $r$ internal wins. These $k$ functions satisfy one linear relation, so score-determined statistics have dimension $k−1$.

3Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsAug 14, 2026Significance 3/100Registry: unreviewed

Score-Determined Induced Tournament Statistics: an All-Orders Classification

Prior state unknownproved

A tournament orients every pair in a round-robin (winner → loser). The score sequence is the sorted win-count list. Reversing a directed 3-cycle never changes scores, so score-equivalent tournaments can look structurally different. Question: Which linear combinations of induced k-subtournament type-counts are score-determined — identical across all tournaments sharing a score sequence, at any host size? Answer:…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

A tournament orients every pair in a round-robin (winner → loser). The score sequence is the sorted win-count list. Reversing a directed 3-cycle never changes scores, so score-equivalent tournaments can look structurally different. Question: Which linear combinations of induced k-subtournament type-counts are score-determined — identical across all tournaments sharing a score sequence, at any host size? Answer: Exactly the linear combinations of degree-multiplicity counts $m_0,\dots,m_{k−1}$, where $m_r$ counts how many of the $k$ chosen vertices have exactly $r$ internal wins. These $k$ functions satisfy one linear relation, so score-determined statistics have dimension $k−1$.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.