algorithms-optimization / Approximation algorithms; string algorithms

A polynomial-time factor-2 approximation for shortest common superstring (the question behind the Tarhio-Ukkonen greedy conjecture)

Theorem 1.1: a deterministic algorithm, polynomial in the total encoded input size (including symbol labels), outputs for every finite family of explicitly represented strings a common superstring TT with ∣T∣≤2 OPT|T|\le2\,\mathrm{OPT}. The proof builds a balanced hierarchical graph on all substrings from forced occurrence counts (a lower bound WW on the optimum), decomposes it into periodic layers and connects them at extra cost at most WW. It does not show that Greedy or the Collapsing procedure attains factor 2 (Greedy is reported false by Shibata 2026), and gives nothing below factor 2. An August 2026 preprint of Chukhin, Kulikov, Mihajlin and Smal reported 7/37/3.

35Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

algorithms-optimizationSep 24, 2026Significance 35/100Registry: lean checked

A polynomial-time factor-2 approximation for shortest common superstring (the question behind the Tarhio-Ukkonen greedy conjecture)

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1.1: a deterministic algorithm, polynomial in the total encoded input size (including symbol labels), outputs for every finite family of explicitly represented strings a common superstring TT with ∣T∣≤2 OPT|T|\le2\,\mathrm{OPT}. The proof builds a balanced hierarchical graph on all substrings from forced occurrence counts (a lower bound WW on the optimum), decomposes it into periodic layers and connects them at e…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: a deterministic algorithm, polynomial in the total encoded input size (including symbol labels), outputs for every finite family of explicitly represented strings a common superstring TT with ∣T∣≤2 OPT|T|\le2\,\mathrm{OPT}. The proof builds a balanced hierarchical graph on all substrings from forced occurrence counts (a lower bound WW on the optimum), decomposes it into periodic layers and connects them at extra cost at most WW. It does not show that Greedy or the Collapsing procedure attains factor 2 (Greedy is reported false by Shibata 2026), and gives nothing below factor 2. An August 2026 preprint of Chukhin, Kulikov, Mihajlin and Smal reported 7/37/3.

Theorem 1.1: a deterministic algorithm, polynomial in the total encoded input size (including symbol labels), outputs for every finite family of explicitly represented strings a common superstring TT with ∣T∣≤2 OPT|T|\le2\,\mathrm{OPT}. The proof builds a balanced hierarchical graph on all substrings from forced occurrence counts (a lower bound WW on the optimum), decomposes it into periodic layers and connects them at extra cost at most WW. It does not show that Greedy or the Collapsing procedure attains factor 2 (Greedy is reported false by Shibata 2026), and gives nothing below factor 2. An August 2026 preprint of Chukhin, Kulikov, Mihajlin and Smal reported 7/37/3.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

A polynomial-time factor-2 approximation for shortest common superstring (the question behind the Tarhio-Ukkonen greedy conjecture) — Mathematical Frontier Network