geometry-topology / Convex geometry; isotropic constants and the slicing problem
The strong isotropic constant conjecture: simplices maximize the isotropic constant
Claims Theorem 1.1: for every n≥1 and every convex body K⊂Rn, LK≤(n!)1/n/((n+1)(n+1)/(2n)n+2), with equality if and only if K is a simplex. Also claims the sharp entropy bound h(f)≥m+21logdetCov(f) for every log-concave density on Rm, with equality exactly for affine images of products of one-sided exponentials, proved via Gaussian-to-target Brenier transport. Via Klartag (2018) it yields the non-symmetric Mahler inequality ∣K∣∣K∘∣≥(n+1)n+1/(n!)2, already listed from a separate manuscript of the same release. It gives no new information on the symmetric slicing constant or on symmetric Mahler.
Claims Theorem 1.1: for every n≥1 and every convex body K⊂Rn, LK≤(n!)1/n/((n+1)(n+1)/(2n)n+2), with equality if and only if K is a simplex. Also claims the sharp entropy bound h(f)≥m+21logdetCov(f) for every log-concave density on Rm, with equality exactly for affine images of products of one-sided exponentials, proved via Gaussian-to-target B…
Claims Theorem 1.1: for every n≥1 and every convex body K⊂Rn, LK≤(n!)1/n/((n+1)(n+1)/(2n)n+2), with equality if and only if K is a simplex. Also claims the sharp entropy bound h(f)≥m+21logdetCov(f) for every log-concave density on Rm, with equality exactly for affine images of products of one-sided exponentials, proved via Gaussian-to-target Brenier transport. Via Klartag (2018) it yields the non-symmetric Mahler inequality ∣K∣∣K∘∣≥(n+1)n+1/(n!)2, already listed from a separate manuscript of the same release. It gives no new information on the symmetric slicing constant or on symmetric Mahler.
Claims Theorem 1.1: for every n≥1 and every convex body K⊂Rn, LK≤(n!)1/n/((n+1)(n+1)/(2n)n+2), with equality if and only if K is a simplex. Also claims the sharp entropy bound h(f)≥m+21logdetCov(f) for every log-concave density on Rm, with equality exactly for affine images of products of one-sided exponentials, proved via Gaussian-to-target Brenier transport. Via Klartag (2018) it yields the non-symmetric Mahler inequality ∣K∣∣K∘∣≥(n+1)n+1/(n!)2, already listed from a separate manuscript of the same release. It gives no new information on the symmetric slicing constant or on symmetric Mahler.