The formal proof constructs a complex polynomial p such that
p(0)=0,p′(0)=1,
and for every critical point c of p,
cp(c)>1.
Thus at z=0 there is no critical point satisfying
∣c∣∣p(0)−p(c)∣≤∣p′(0)∣=1,
which disproves Smale's conjectured universal constant K=1.
The counterexample has very large unspecified degree and violates the bound only by a small margin, so it is consistent with Smale's original K=4 theorem, the known low-degree positive cases, and previous asymptotic improvements toward 1.
The formal proof constructs a complex polynomial p such that
p(0)=0,p′(0)=1,
and for every critical point c of p,
cp(c)>1.
Thus at z=0 there is no critical point satisfying
∣c∣∣p(0)−p(c)∣≤∣p′(0)∣=1,
which disproves Smale's conjectured universal constant K=1.
The counterexample has very large unspecified degree and violates the bound only by a smal…
The formal proof constructs a complex polynomial p such that
p(0)=0,p′(0)=1,
and for every critical point c of p,
cp(c)>1.
Thus at z=0 there is no critical point satisfying
∣c∣∣p(0)−p(c)∣≤∣p′(0)∣=1,
which disproves Smale's conjectured universal constant K=1.
The counterexample has very large unspecified degree and violates the bound only by a small margin, so it is consistent with Smale's original K=4 theorem, the known low-degree positive cases, and previous asymptotic improvements toward 1.
The formal proof constructs a complex polynomial p such that
p(0)=0,p′(0)=1,
and for every critical point c of p,
cp(c)>1.
Thus at z=0 there is no critical point satisfying
∣c∣∣p(0)−p(c)∣≤∣p′(0)∣=1,
which disproves Smale's conjectured universal constant K=1.
The counterexample has very large unspecified degree and violates the bound only by a small margin, so it is consistent with Smale's original K=4 theorem, the known low-degree positive cases, and previous asymptotic improvements toward 1.