logic-foundations / Model theory

$SOP_2 = SOP_3$

The classes of SOP_2 and SOP_3 first-order theories coincide. This answers a question of Džamonja and Shelah from 2004.

35Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

logic-foundationsAug 13, 2026Significance 35/100Registry: unreviewed

$SOP_2 = SOP_3$

Prior state unknownproved

The new content is $SOP_2 \Rightarrow SOP_3$; the converse implication was known from the start. Dzamonja and Shelah asked whether either implication in $SOP_3 \Rightarrow SOP_2 \Rightarrow SOP_1$ reverses: Mutchnik answered the second ($SOP_1 = SOP_2$), and this answers the first, collapsing the bottom of the hierarchy to $SOP_1 = SOP_2 = SOP_3$. The $SOP_n$ hierarchy for $n \ge 3$ remains, as does everything abo…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

The classes of SOP_2 and SOP_3 first-order theories coincide. This answers a question of Džamonja and Shelah from 2004.

The new content is $SOP_2 \Rightarrow SOP_3$; the converse implication was known from the start. Dzamonja and Shelah asked whether either implication in $SOP_3 \Rightarrow SOP_2 \Rightarrow SOP_1$ reverses: Mutchnik answered the second ($SOP_1 = SOP_2$), and this answers the first, collapsing the bottom of the hierarchy to $SOP_1 = SOP_2 = SOP_3$. The $SOP_n$ hierarchy for $n \ge 3$ remains, as does everything above it.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.