combinatorics / Additive combinatorics

The Largest Sum-Free Subset of the Lattice Cube

How dense can a sum-free subset of the lattice cube $\{1,\dots,n\}^d$ be? Aydinian and Cameron asked for the limiting density, which is also Problem 6 in Ben Green's list of 100 open problems. The natural conjecture is that the optimum is a slice $\{x : 1 \le L(x) < 2\}$ for a linear map $L$, previously known only for $d \le 4$. Proved for all $d$. The paper also shows the same phenomenon fails if the cube is replaced by an arbitrary convex set avoiding the origin.

30Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsMay 1, 2026Significance 30/100Registry: unreviewed

The Largest Sum-Free Subset of the Lattice Cube

Prior state unknownproved

How dense can a sum-free subset of the lattice cube $\{1,\dots,n\}^d$ be? Aydinian and Cameron asked for the limiting density, which is also Problem 6 in Ben Green's list of 100 open problems. The natural conjecture is that the optimum is a slice $\{x : 1 \le L(x) < 2\}$ for a linear map $L$, previously known only for $d \le 4$. Proved for all $d$. The paper also shows the same phenomenon fails if the cube is repl…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

How dense can a sum-free subset of the lattice cube $\{1,\dots,n\}^d$ be? Aydinian and Cameron asked for the limiting density, which is also Problem 6 in Ben Green's list of 100 open problems. The natural conjecture is that the optimum is a slice $\{x : 1 \le L(x) < 2\}$ for a linear map $L$, previously known only for $d \le 4$. Proved for all $d$. The paper also shows the same phenomenon fails if the cube is replaced by an arbitrary convex set avoiding the origin.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.