geometry-topology / Differential geometry

Universal volume growth bounds from positive intermediate curvature

Gromov's 1986 question drew three independent proofs within about 24 hours, two with AI in the loop. Ge's non-AI proof (heat-kernel Fisher metric, Nash entropy) came first, 13 August. Antonelli's proof here (14 August, GPT-5.6 Sol) takes a different route, Hodge obstruction and rank improvement, and its headline addition is the general family: for every 0≤m≤n−20\le m\le n-2, nonnegative Ricci plus positive (m+1)(m{+}1)-intermediate curvature forces at most mm-dimensional growth - linear growth under biRicci curvature at m=1m=1, plus a noncollapsed Urysohn-width bound; the author states this extension is his own, not the model's. Kong and Zhu's proof (also 14 August; GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra and Codex, "essential ideas were generated by AI") proves the same case plus a related codimension-one conjecture via a heat-transport deficit, close to Ge's method by its own account, produced before Ge's went public and not derived from it. Headline axes stay Antonelli's, for the broader scope.

38Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

geometry-topologyAug 13, 2026Significance 38/100Registry: unreviewed

Universal volume growth bounds from positive intermediate curvature

Prior state unknown→proved

Gromov's 1986 question drew three independent proofs within about 24 hours, two with AI in the loop. Ge's non-AI proof (heat-kernel Fisher metric, Nash entropy) came first, 13 August. Antonelli's proof here (14 August, GPT-5.6 Sol) takes a different route, Hodge obstruction and rank improvement, and its headline addition is the general family: for every 0≤m≤n−20\le m\le n-2, nonnegative Ricci plus positive (m+1)(m{+}1)-inte…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Gromov's 1986 question drew three independent proofs within about 24 hours, two with AI in the loop. Ge's non-AI proof (heat-kernel Fisher metric, Nash entropy) came first, 13 August. Antonelli's proof here (14 August, GPT-5.6 Sol) takes a different route, Hodge obstruction and rank improvement, and its headline addition is the general family: for every 0≤m≤n−20\le m\le n-2, nonnegative Ricci plus positive (m+1)(m{+}1)-intermediate curvature forces at most mm-dimensional growth - linear growth under biRicci curvature at m=1m=1, plus a noncollapsed Urysohn-width bound; the author states this extension is his own, not the model's. Kong and Zhu's proof (also 14 August; GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra and Codex, "essential ideas were generated by AI") proves the same case plus a related codimension-one conjecture via a heat-transport deficit, close to Ge's method by its own account, produced before Ge's went public and not derived from it. Headline axes stay Antonelli's, for the broader scope.

Gromov's 1986 question drew three independent proofs within about 24 hours, two with AI in the loop. Ge's non-AI proof (heat-kernel Fisher metric, Nash entropy) came first, 13 August. Antonelli's proof here (14 August, GPT-5.6 Sol) takes a different route, Hodge obstruction and rank improvement, and its headline addition is the general family: for every 0≤m≤n−20\le m\le n-2, nonnegative Ricci plus positive (m+1)(m{+}1)-intermediate curvature forces at most mm-dimensional growth - linear growth under biRicci curvature at m=1m=1, plus a noncollapsed Urysohn-width bound; the author states this extension is his own, not the model's. Kong and Zhu's proof (also 14 August; GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra and Codex, "essential ideas were generated by AI") proves the same case plus a related codimension-one conjecture via a heat-transport deficit, close to Ge's method by its own account, produced before Ge's went public and not derived from it. Headline axes stay Antonelli's, for the broader scope.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record