theoretical-computer-science / Computational complexity; time-space simulation

Williams's one-tape question: simulating one-tape time TT in O(T1/2−δ)O(T^{1/2-\delta}) space

Theorem 1.1: for a fixed deterministic machine with one writable tape and head (and finitely many read-only input heads), the finite-control and halting outcome by time TT can be computed in O(T2/5log⁡C(T+2))O(T^{2/5}\log^C(T+2)) work-space bits given the cap TT; without a supplied cap, a machine halting at time tt is simulated in O((t+2)2/5 polylog)O((t+2)^{2/5}\,\mathrm{polylog}) space. Hence O(T1/2−δ)O(T^{1/2-\delta}) for every δ<1/10\delta<1/10. Simulation time is unrestricted, the final tape is not materialized, no lower bound or optimality is claimed, and for several writable tapes only O(T polylog)O(\sqrt T\,\mathrm{polylog}) is given.

20Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

theoretical-computer-scienceSep 25, 2026Significance 20/100Registry: lean checked

Williams's one-tape question: simulating one-tape time TT in O(T1/2−δ)O(T^{1/2-\delta}) space

Prior state unknown→proved

Theorem 1.1: for a fixed deterministic machine with one writable tape and head (and finitely many read-only input heads), the finite-control and halting outcome by time TT can be computed in O(T2/5log⁡C(T+2))O(T^{2/5}\log^C(T+2)) work-space bits given the cap TT; without a supplied cap, a machine halting at time tt is simulated in O((t+2)2/5 polylog)O((t+2)^{2/5}\,\mathrm{polylog}) space. Hence O(T1/2−δ)O(T^{1/2-\delta}) for every δ<1/10\delta<1/10. Simul…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Theorem 1.1: for a fixed deterministic machine with one writable tape and head (and finitely many read-only input heads), the finite-control and halting outcome by time TT can be computed in O(T2/5log⁡C(T+2))O(T^{2/5}\log^C(T+2)) work-space bits given the cap TT; without a supplied cap, a machine halting at time tt is simulated in O((t+2)2/5 polylog)O((t+2)^{2/5}\,\mathrm{polylog}) space. Hence O(T1/2−δ)O(T^{1/2-\delta}) for every δ<1/10\delta<1/10. Simulation time is unrestricted, the final tape is not materialized, no lower bound or optimality is claimed, and for several writable tapes only O(T polylog)O(\sqrt T\,\mathrm{polylog}) is given.

Theorem 1.1: for a fixed deterministic machine with one writable tape and head (and finitely many read-only input heads), the finite-control and halting outcome by time TT can be computed in O(T2/5log⁡C(T+2))O(T^{2/5}\log^C(T+2)) work-space bits given the cap TT; without a supplied cap, a machine halting at time tt is simulated in O((t+2)2/5 polylog)O((t+2)^{2/5}\,\mathrm{polylog}) space. Hence O(T1/2−δ)O(T^{1/2-\delta}) for every δ<1/10\delta<1/10. Simulation time is unrestricted, the final tape is not materialized, no lower bound or optimality is claimed, and for several writable tapes only O(T polylog)O(\sqrt T\,\mathrm{polylog}) is given.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record