combinatorics / Graph invariants

Written on the Wall II, Graph Conjecture 109

Must every connected graph satisfy the proposed upper bound on its independence number in terms of residue and largest induced-bipartite-subgraph order? The family $\overline{K}_{2r+1} \vee (K_r \sqcup K_r)$ violates it for every $r \ge 3$.

5Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

combinatoricsJul 28, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: lean verified

Written on the Wall II, Graph Conjecture 109

Prior state unknowndisproved

Must every connected graph satisfy the proposed upper bound on its independence number in terms of residue and largest induced-bipartite-subgraph order? The family $\overline{K}_{2r+1} \vee (K_r \sqcup K_r)$ violates it for every $r \ge 3$.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Must every connected graph satisfy the proposed upper bound on its independence number in terms of residue and largest induced-bipartite-subgraph order? The family $\overline{K}_{2r+1} \vee (K_r \sqcup K_r)$ violates it for every $r \ge 3$.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.

Written on the Wall II, Graph Conjecture 109 — Mathematical Frontier Network