algorithms-optimization / Randomized algorithms

Approximating Two-Terminal Network Reliability

Does two-terminal reliability, the probability that $s$ still reaches $t$ when edges fail independently, admit a fully polynomial-time randomised approximation scheme? Asked explicitly in Kannan's 1994 survey and left open while the all-terminal cases were settled by Karger and by Guo and Jerrum. Answered positively for general graphs, both directed and undirected. The complementary unreliability question is shown to be BIS-hard, so it is unlikely to admit one.

25Significance / 100
1Frontier events
0Verification tasks
0Recorded attempts

Temporal state

Current frontier

No reconciled state yet.

Append-only history

Frontier timeline

algorithms-optimizationAug 3, 2026Significance 25/100Registry: unreviewed

Approximating Two-Terminal Network Reliability

Prior state unknownproved

Does two-terminal reliability, the probability that $s$ still reaches $t$ when edges fail independently, admit a fully polynomial-time randomised approximation scheme? Asked explicitly in Kannan's 1994 survey and left open while the all-terminal cases were settled by Karger and by Guo and Jerrum. Answered positively for general graphs, both directed and undirected. The complementary unreliability question is shown…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review

Research memory

Claims and attempts

Scoped claims

Source authenticated

Does two-terminal reliability, the probability that $s$ still reaches $t$ when edges fail independently, admit a fully polynomial-time randomised approximation scheme? Asked explicitly in Kannan's 1994 survey and left open while the all-terminal cases were settled by Karger and by Guo and Jerrum. Answered positively for general graphs, both directed and undirected. The complementary unreliability question is shown to be BIS-hard, so it is unlikely to admit one.

Recorded attempts

Evidence graph

Connected research record

No public relationships recorded yet.