Open registry federation

Mathematical findings

690 source-grounded records. Verification labels remain separate from source authentication and publication status.

Editorial data from VibeMathed is CC BY 4.0 licensed. Linked papers and authors’ text retain their own rights. Each record links to its registry entry and primary source. Verification labels are attributed to the registry.

combinatoricsJul 21, 2026Significance 15/100Registry: unreviewed

Pak-Slonim Conjecture on Stretched Schubert Structure Constants

Prior state unknown→proved

VibeMathed recorded: Pak-Slonim Conjecture on Stretched Schubert Structure Constants. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algorithms-optimizationAug 14, 2026Significance 15/100Registry: unreviewed

Convergence of Three-Block ADMM with Identity Third Block

Prior state unknown→disproved

VibeMathed recorded: Convergence of Three-Block ADMM with Identity Third Block. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsMay 21, 2026Significance 14/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #138

Prior state unknown→proved

the stronger question W(k)1/k→∞W(k)^{1/k} \to \infty remains open

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
logic-foundationsAug 19, 2026Significance 14/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #501: infinite independent sets for families of small outer measure

Prior state unknown→independent

Independent of ZFC, which is why this entry is the first to carry that result rather than proved or disproved. Both directions are formalized: Hechler's 1972 construction gives a model where the answer is no, and adding c+\mathfrak{c}^+ random reals over a model of CH gives one where it is yes. The credit is shared and mostly human. Newelski, Pawlikowski and Seredynski settled the problem's second question in 1987,…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 11, 2026Significance 14/100Registry: unreviewed

The Five-Dimensional Geode Challenge of Amdeberhan, Kauers and Zeilberger

Prior state unknown→proved

VibeMathed recorded: The Five-Dimensional Geode Challenge of Amdeberhan, Kauers and Zeilberger. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryJul 31, 2026Significance 14/100Registry: unreviewed

Improved integrality of Donaldson–Thomas invariants of loop quivers (GKS Conjecture 1.3 for twist knots)

Prior state unknown→proved

The sharp valuation bounds and optimal γ(m)\gamma(m) are proved for ALL loop quivers m≥2m\ge2, hence for the extremal BPS invariants of all twist knots (both rows, matching every twist-knot entry of GKS Table 1). Scope limits: the m=3m=3/figure-eight divisibility 2nr/r∈Z2n_r/r\in\mathbb Z was previously proved by Basor–Conrey–Morrison (arXiv:1703.00990), whose per-rr 22-adic characterization for m=3m=3 is finer than the uni…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algebraAug 25, 2026Significance 14/100Registry: site confirmed

Fröberg’s conjecture for quintics and septics in four variables

Prior state unknown→proved

Let S=k[x1,x2,x3,x4]S=k[x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4] over any characteristic-zero field. For each d∈{5,7}d\in\{5,7\} and every r≥1r\ge1, the paper proves that rr general degree-dd forms satisfy Fröberg’s predicted Hilbert series HS⁡S/(F1,…,Fr)(t)=[(1−td)r(1−t)4]+. \operatorname{HS}_{S/(F_1,\ldots,F_r)}(t) = \left[\frac{(1-t^d)^r}{(1-t)^4}\right]_+. The genuinely new ranges are 6≤r≤116\le r\le11 for quintics and 6≤r≤216\le r\le21 for septics. These are reduced to finitely many exac…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryJul 20, 2026Significance 13/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #424

Prior state unknown→proved

Proves positive lower density. The Formal Conjectures encoding asks for Set.HasPosDensity, a density that exists and is positive; erdosproblems.com says Erdos most likely meant lower density.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJun 23, 2026Significance 13/100Registry: unreviewed

Erdos Problems #593 and #1177

Prior state unknown→proved

settles two numbered Erdos problems at once

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
analysisJul 1, 2026Significance 13/100Registry: site confirmed

Erdős Problem #119

Prior state unknown→proved

VibeMathed recorded: Erdős Problem #119. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algebraJul 20, 2026Significance 13/100Registry: lean verified

Kourovka Problem 21.150 - Rank Inequality for p-Group Extensions

Prior state unknown→disproved

VibeMathed recorded: Kourovka Problem 21.150 - Rank Inequality for p-Group Extensions. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryJul 19, 2026Significance 13/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #390: the second-order constant for f(n)−2nf(n)-2n

Prior state unknown→proved

The headline is the constant, and its two halves have different histories. The lower bound, lim inf⁡(f(n)−2n)/(n/log⁡n)≥4029639598/25970038185\liminf (f(n)-2n)/(n/\log n) \ge 4029639598/25970038185, is not new here: it is Mausberg's thirteen-layer valuation cut, posted to the erdosproblems.com forum in May 2026 and credited as such in the paper. Its author wrote there that it "does not prove an upper bound, nor does it prove that an asymptotic constant exists."…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 23, 2026Significance 13/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #593

Prior state unknown→proved

VibeMathed recorded: Erdős Problem #593. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsSep 5, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: lean checked

The γ–θ conjecture in eternal domination

Prior state unknown→disproved

Let HH be the Berlekamp–van Lint–Seidel graph on 243243 vertices, the Cayley graph of Z35\mathbb Z_3^5 with strongly regular parameters (243,22,1,2), (243,22,1,2), and let G=H‾G=\overline H. The proof establishes γ(G)=3 \gamma(G)=3 because every pair has a common neighbor in HH, while an HH-triangle gives a dominating triple in GG. It then proves γ∞(G)=3 \gamma^\infty(G)=3 by showing that the family of all dominating triples…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
geometry-topologyAug 17, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: unreviewed

A 32-leaf tree requiring six coordinates for an isometric ℓ∞\ell_\infty embedding

Prior state unknown→disproved

Disproved. An explicit 32-leaf tree has least isometric ℓ∞\ell_\infty-dimension six, not the conjectured five, and keeps dimension six under every assignment of positive edge lengths, so the weighted sharp-threshold conjecture falls too. Every tree with at most 31 leaves does attain ⌈log⁡2t⌉\lceil \log_2 t \rceil, so 32 is the first failure; Brigham et al. had checked through 21. The proof is finite and exact: six explici…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algebraAug 18, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: lean checked

Colombo’s difference-power determinant conjecture

Prior state unknown→proved

For pairwise distinct real numbers x1,…,xNx_1,\ldots,x_N and an integer D≥1D\ge1, Ma proves the complete classification det⁡[(xj−xi)D]i,j=1N≠0⟺D≥N−1 and (N is even or D is even). \det\bigl[(x_j-x_i)^D\bigr]_{i,j=1}^{N}\ne0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad D\ge N-1\ \text{and}\ \bigl(N\text{ is even or }D\text{ is even}\bigr). This fully resolves Colombo’s original conjecture for even NN. The new part is the even-size, odd-exponent branch, strengthened to the strict Pfaffian…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
theoretical-computer-scienceSep 3, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: site confirmed

Unrestricted Boolean multiplicative complexity of four-term binary polynomial multiplication

proved→proved

The exact Mul4 instance is resolved: its unrestricted XOR--AND multiplicative complexity is 9. The restricted bilinear/quadratic value 9 was classical; the new theorem proves that arbitrary nonlinear Boolean reuse cannot lower it. This is a natural positive special case of the Boyar--Find question, not a solution of the general (n,m) problem. The lower bound is a conceptual structural argument. A complete Lean 4 for…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryAug 1, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: lean checked

Local limits along squares and prime values of digital functions

Prior state unknown→proved

New theorems, not a formalisation of known results. In base ten the bare existence of a square with any admissible digit sum was recorded in the recreational literature (Murthy–Ashbacher 2005); the theorem here is the quantitative all-base version — roots coprime to b (excluding their trailing-zero trick), exp(c_b√q) representations of controlled size — and that statement is what is machine-checked, with effective b…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryApr 23, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #202

Prior state unknown→proved

VibeMathed recorded: Erdős Problem #202. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
theoretical-computer-scienceJul 10, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: unreviewed

Klopp-Zadik Question on Polynomial-Time Node-Private Recovery

Prior state unknown→proved

VibeMathed recorded: Klopp-Zadik Question on Polynomial-Time Node-Private Recovery. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
analysisJun 22, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #671

Prior state unknown→proved

Both parts claimed answered affirmatively, with a Lean formalization; two proof claims are filed on erdosproblems.com but the problem is still listed open

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
theoretical-computer-scienceJul 24, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: unreviewed

Ghasemi-Kopparty Problem on Sparse SS-Decoding Polynomials

Prior state unknown→proved

the PIR consequence is conditional on a number-theoretic conjecture implied by either the generalized repunit conjecture or Schinzel's hypothesis H, and is unconditional for s <= 15

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryMay 21, 2026Significance 12/100Registry: lean verified

Erdős Problem #12

Prior state unknown→proved

parts (i) and (ii) resolved - a near-linear-density construction exists, refuting the N^{1-c} decay; the reciprocal-sum part remains open

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review