Open registry federation

Mathematical findings

405 source-grounded records. Verification labels remain separate from source authentication and publication status.

Imported from VibeMathed under CC BY 4.0. Each record links to its registry entry and named primary source. Registry verification is preserved verbatim.

combinatoricsJul 26, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Zero Forcing versus Independence in Subcubic Graphs

Prior state unknowndisproved

Is the zero forcing number of every connected graph with maximum degree 33 at most its independence number plus one? A connected 24-vertex subcubic graph with independence number 99 and zero forcing number 1111 refutes this 2017 TxGraffiti conjecture, and a 36-vertex cubic variant refutes the cubic form: Z=α+2Z = \alpha + 2 is attained.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 30, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Graffiti Conjecture 6

Prior state unknowndisproved

Infinite family of counterexamples; mathematical argument internally checked, with external verification and novelty review pending.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryJun 12, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Sun's Conjecture 4.6(ii) on Trigonometric Permanents

Prior state unknowndisproved

For an odd prime pp, do Sun's normalized trigonometric permanents satisfy sp<0    p5(mod12)s_p < 0 \iff p \equiv 5 \pmod{12} and sp<0    p7(mod8)s'_p < 0 \iff p \equiv 7 \pmod 8? Exact computation at p=29p = 29 refutes both sign laws.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
analysisAug 7, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: unreviewed

Complete rational classification of fifth-order autocorrelation ambiguities on U30U_{30}

Prior state unknownproved

Agulnick and Busick-Warner exhibited a family of fifth-order ambiguities on the exact unit support U30U_{30} and conjectured that it was not a complete classification because it did not use the full field Q(ζ30)\mathbb Q(\zeta_{30}). This work proves the complete classification. The larger field enlarges the common amplitude α\alpha, while every relative ambiguity remains a norm-one parameter in Q(ζ6)\mathbb Q(\zeta_6). Th…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 14, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: unreviewed

Sivaraman's Perfect-Divisibility Characterization Question

Prior state unknowndisproved

Sivaraman asked whether perfect divisibility is characterized by its chromatic consequence: is a graph GG perfectly divisible if and only if χ(H)(ω(H)+12)\chi(H) \le \binom{\omega(H)+1}{2} for every induced subgraph HH of GG? False: the Paley graph P(17)P(17) satisfies the chromatic bound hereditarily but is not perfectly divisible.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algorithms-optimizationAug 4, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: unreviewed

Exact SSUF scenario-count ladder on the four-terminal planar gadget

Prior state unknownproved

Fixed four-terminal planar DAG; positive route-cost differences for m≥2, with non-attained suprema; signed/zero only for m=1, whose attainment is unstated. No topology-wide/unrestricted-planar claim.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 24, 2026Significance 3/100Registry: unreviewed

Depth of the in-tree of ss under qqsq1q \mapsto q s q^{-1} on nn-cycles

Prior state unknownproved

Opus 4.8 constructed a branch of the stated depth, giving a lower bound, and believed it had a matching upper bound; that proof was wrong and the statement stayed a conjecture. FABLE 5 later proved it. In the author's summary of the method: "The proof turns conjugation, near ss, into base-pp arithmetic." A cycle near the fixed point splits into a coarse base permutation and a vector of carries in Z/p\mathbb{Z}/p,…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 14, 2026Significance 3/100Registry: unreviewed

Score-Determined Induced Tournament Statistics: an All-Orders Classification

Prior state unknownproved

A tournament orients every pair in a round-robin (winner → loser). The score sequence is the sorted win-count list. Reversing a directed 3-cycle never changes scores, so score-equivalent tournaments can look structurally different. Question: Which linear combinations of induced k-subtournament type-counts are score-determined — identical across all tournaments sharing a score sequence, at any host size? Answer: Ex…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review