Open registry federation

Mathematical findings

639 source-grounded records. Verification labels remain separate from source authentication and publication status.

Imported from VibeMathed under CC BY 4.0. Each record links to its registry entry and named primary source. Registry verification is preserved verbatim.

combinatoricsJun 12, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Koch-Narayan Conjecture 1

Prior state unknowndisproved

For a bipartite graph without isolated vertices and with a unique minimum dominating set, does the proposed function m(n,γ)m(n, \gamma) bound the number of edges whenever γ2\gamma \ge 2 and n3γn \ge 3\gamma? A 1313-vertex bipartite graph with 2222 edges exceeds the conjectured maximum of 2121.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJun 12, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Pandey Parity Conjecture for Generalized Petersen Graphs

Prior state unknowndisproved

For every n2k+1n \ge 2k + 1, is the independence polynomial of GP(n,k)GP(n, k) real-rooted if and only if kk is even? Exact Sturm counts refute both directions.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 22, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: lean verified

Written on the Wall II, Graph Conjecture 103

Prior state unknowndisproved

For every connected graph GG, is α(G)b(G)log(eccavg(G))\alpha(G) \le \lfloor b(G) - \log(\operatorname{ecc}_{avg}(G)) \rfloor, where b(G)b(G) is the largest induced-bipartite-subgraph order? An 1111-vertex counterexample - a triangle with four leaves on each of two vertices - has α=9\alpha = 9 against bound 88.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsMar 25, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: lean verified

Hamilton Decompositions of the Directed 3-Torus

Prior state unknownproved

For D3(m)=CmCmCmD_3(m) = \vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_m, can the full arc set be partitioned into three directed Hamilton cycles for every integer m3m \ge 3?

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsMay 18, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Polylogarithmic Full-Chord Buffon Discrepancy

Prior state unknownproved

This settles Steinerberger's third open question and separates the two models: in the disk, full chords cost you a factor growing like logL\log L over what is achievable without the restriction. It also improves the Steinhaus-type O(L1/3)O(L^{1/3}) to polylogarithmic within the full-chord class. It does not settle the Buffon discrepancy problem itself. Steinerberger's first question - whether every convex body admits a se…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
number-theoryJun 12, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Sun's Conjecture 4.6(ii) on Trigonometric Permanents

Prior state unknowndisproved

For an odd prime pp, do Sun's normalized trigonometric permanents satisfy sp<0    p5(mod12)s_p < 0 \iff p \equiv 5 \pmod{12} and sp<0    p7(mod8)s'_p < 0 \iff p \equiv 7 \pmod 8? Exact computation at p=29p = 29 refutes both sign laws.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
probability-statisticsApr 24, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: lean verified

Optimal Strategies in the All-Heads Coin Game

Prior state unknownproved

In the all-heads coin game a player starts with nn coins, each showing heads with probability pp; each round all remaining coins are flipped, the player must set aside at least one head (losing if none shows), and wins once all coins are set aside. Determine optimal strategies and the winning probability wn,pw_{n,p}. Resolved: for p=12p=\tfrac12 every strategy achieves wn,1/2=12w_{n,1/2}=\tfrac12; for p>12p>\tfrac12 the single…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 21, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: lean verified

Written on the Wall II, Graph Conjecture 143

Prior state unknownproved

For every finite connected graph, is girth(G)+1\operatorname{girth}(G) + 1 at most the product of its largest induced-tree order and its second-smallest degree?

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJun 12, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

TxGraffiti-Davila Conjecture 9

Prior state unknowndisproved

If GG is connected, cubic and diamond-free, must the zero-forcing number satisfy Z(G)γ(G)+2Z(G) \le \gamma(G) + 2? A connected cubic triangle-free 1414-vertex graph has Z=7Z = 7 and γ=4\gamma = 4.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 12, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: site confirmed

Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path

Prior state unknownproved

The a = 3 slice is settled outright. The parent conjecture's dihedral side has since been resolved for every a >= 4 as well (see the related entry), so Conjecture 4.9's claim 1 + (a-1)(b-1) now stands proved for all a >= 3; the trivial a = 1, 2 cases and the cyclic analogue for a >= 4 remain formally unaddressed.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 8, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Kurkov's Fubini-Number Sum Conjecture

Prior state unknownproved

For the Fubini numbers a(n)a(n), is a(n)=k=02n11A284005(k)a(n) = \sum_{k=0}^{2^{n-1}-1} A284005(k) for every n>0n > 0, as conjectured on the OEIS in 2018?

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 26, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Zero Forcing versus Independence in Subcubic Graphs

Prior state unknowndisproved

Is the zero forcing number of every connected graph with maximum degree 33 at most its independence number plus one? A connected 24-vertex subcubic graph with independence number 99 and zero forcing number 1111 refutes this 2017 TxGraffiti conjecture, and a 36-vertex cubic variant refutes the cubic form: Z=α+2Z = \alpha + 2 is attained.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 29, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Written on the Wall II, Conjecture 284

Prior state unknowndisproved

WOW-284 asserts that the minimum dual degree of every connected graph of order at least three and girth at least five is at most the negative of its least distance eigenvalue. The paper refutes it with exact counterexamples of orders 38, 39, 40, 42 and 50, and develops a structural theory of the failure.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algorithms-optimizationAug 5, 2026Significance 5/100Registry: unreviewed

Problem MAIS-O60: Single-Neuron Fourier Alignment

Prior state unknowndisproved

Does a single ReLU neuron trained on modular addition align to one Fourier frequency? Open Problem MAIS-O60, itself posed by Claude Fable 5 under the direction of Lionel Levine, is answered negatively: an explicit construction reaches a frozen state whose Fourier energy is spread equally across all nonzero frequency classes, on an open set of initial conditions.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 26, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: site confirmed

An Exact All-Width Plateau for the Three-Summand Tu-Deng Count modulo 2k12^k-1

Prior state unknownproved

Answered in full: for every k4k\ge4, a target with exactly two nonadjacent zero digits has Fk(t)=(k+23)3k4F_k(t)=(k+23)3^{k-4}, independently of the distance between the zeros. Exact at every width, no error term, no hypothesis on kk (Theorem 1.1). This is an evaluation, not an extremal result, and the paper is explicit about the difference: the plateau value is not maximal. At k=12k=12 it reads 3538=229,63535\cdot3^8=229{,}635 while…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 14, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: unreviewed

Sivaraman's Perfect-Divisibility Characterization Question

Prior state unknowndisproved

Sivaraman asked whether perfect divisibility is characterized by its chromatic consequence: is a graph GG perfectly divisible if and only if χ(H)(ω(H)+12)\chi(H) \le \binom{\omega(H)+1}{2} for every induced subgraph HH of GG? False: the Paley graph P(17)P(17) satisfies the chromatic bound hereditarily but is not perfectly divisible.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
algorithms-optimizationAug 4, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: unreviewed

Exact SSUF scenario-count ladder on the four-terminal planar gadget

Prior state unknownproved

Fixed four-terminal planar DAG; positive route-cost differences for m≥2, with non-attained suprema; signed/zero only for m=1, whose attainment is unstated. No topology-wide/unrestricted-planar claim.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
analysisAug 7, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: unreviewed

Complete rational classification of fifth-order autocorrelation ambiguities on U30U_{30}

Prior state unknownproved

Agulnick and Busick-Warner exhibited a family of fifth-order ambiguities on the exact unit support U30U_{30} and conjectured that it was not a complete classification because it did not use the full field Q(ζ30)\mathbb Q(\zeta_{30}). This work proves the complete classification. The larger field enlarges the common amplitude α\alpha, while every relative ambiguity remains a norm-one parameter in Q(ζ6)\mathbb Q(\zeta_6). Th…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
analysisAug 14, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: site confirmed

Lorist-Schwenninger Remark 2 positivity question

Prior state unknowndisproved

Nothing in the paper's proof is affected. At the witness, inequality (4) holds with slack +27.0, inequality (5) holds with equality (f is inner), and the theorem itself holds with slack 2 - kappa = +0.80. Only the shortcut Remark 2 floats is refuted.

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
differential-equationsMar 16, 2026Significance 4/100Registry: lean verified

Equilibria of the Vlasov-Maxwell-Landau System

Prior state unknownproved

Under smoothness, positivity, decay and score assumptions, are all steady solutions of the Coulomb Vlasov-Maxwell-Landau system on T3×R3\mathbb{T}^3 \times \mathbb{R}^3 necessarily spatially uniform Maxwellians?

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsJul 24, 2026Significance 3/100Registry: unreviewed

Depth of the in-tree of ss under qqsq1q \mapsto q s q^{-1} on nn-cycles

Prior state unknownproved

Opus 4.8 constructed a branch of the stated depth, giving a lower bound, and believed it had a matching upper bound; that proof was wrong and the statement stayed a conjecture. FABLE 5 later proved it. In the author's summary of the method: "The proof turns conjugation, near ss, into base-pp arithmetic." A cycle near the fixed point splits into a coarse base permutation and a vector of carries in Z/p\mathbb{Z}/p,…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
combinatoricsAug 14, 2026Significance 3/100Registry: unreviewed

Score-Determined Induced Tournament Statistics: an All-Orders Classification

Prior state unknownproved

A tournament orients every pair in a round-robin (winner → loser). The score sequence is the sorted win-count list. Reversing a directed 3-cycle never changes scores, so score-equivalent tournaments can look structurally different. Question: Which linear combinations of induced k-subtournament type-counts are score-determined — identical across all tournaments sharing a score sequence, at any host size? Answer: Ex…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review
mathematical-physicsAug 14, 2026Significance 3/100Registry: lean checked

Exact order-three ambiguity of the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton coupling a2a^2 in metric jets, and its fourth-order collapse

Prior state unknownproved

Finite-jet theorems about compiled truncated EMD equation certificates: the exact shear-orbit fiber classification of the complete first seed channels, an explicit collision family with one metric three-jet realized by an actual cubic metric germ (genuine Frechet Ricci value and first derivative), the compiled impossibility theorem, and the fourth-order recovery with equality fiber a=±ba=\pm b. Not settled here: promo…

SourceReplayReproducedFormal proofStatement auditExternal checkExpert reviewPeer review