Editorial data from VibeMathed is CC BY 4.0 licensed. Linked papers and authors’ text retain their own rights. Each record links to its registry entry and primary source. Verification labels are attributed to the registry.
number-theoryApr 15, 2026Significance 10/100Registry: site confirmed
For two qubits, the paper considers
ρ=21∣Φ+⟩⟨Φ+∣+21∣01⟩⟨01∣,
where ∣Φ+⟩=(∣00⟩+∣11⟩)/2. This rank-2 state has no global supporting affine functional for Entanglement of Formation.
Setting ρt=(1−t)ρ+t∣10⟩⟨10∣, Wootters’ formula gives
C(ρt)=21−2t+O(t).
Consequently,…
VibeMathed recorded: The Papamanthou-Tollis Conjecture on Parameterized st-Orientations. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.
VibeMathed recorded: The Target-Free Clique Conjecture for Threshold-Linear Networks. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.
VibeMathed recorded: Kaul-Mudrock Conjecture on the Unlabeled List Color Function. Consult the linked registry entry for the original report and scope.
The manuscript proves the upper bound ∣A∣≤1280 for every admissible subset of the fixed ambient code D. Together with Ho’s existing construction, this determines the exact maximum. The proof partitions D into 256 cosets of a 16-word subspace whose induced forbidden-distance graph is the Clebsch graph; each coset contributes at most five words. This does not determine the unrestricted kissing number…
Proves Haglund's Conjecture 4 for k=1: every non-real first-quadrant zero of Φ1+tΦ2 is simple with strictly decreasing imaginary part, no branch escapes forward, and every finite-multiplicity real collision stays real afterwards. The cases k≥2 remain open. Two readings worth separating: Conjecture 4 asserts the monotone descent alone, so the no-escape and stays-real statements are this paper's own ad…
The dihedral case only, for every a≥4 and b≥1; the substance is the upper bound, which the source paper's own computations could not reach. Together with the sibling a = 3 entry this proves Conjecture 4.9's claim 1+(a−1)(b−1) for all a≥3; the conjecture's trivial a = 1, 2 cases are unaddressed by either entry, and the cyclic analogue Rcyc(Paalt,Kb) for a≥4 remains open. The engin…
The repository supplies an executable verifier in exact integer arithmetic; for n=51 an integer vector x satisfies xTAx>11xTx, so λ1>11=D. The deficit λ1(n)−D(n) grows through n=5000 in the repository's computations, but no asymptotic theorem proving divergence is claimed, so "false for every constant C" is a computed pattern, not a proved one.
One anomaly, which the…
Nineteen individual exact values, each decided by SAT certificate: unsatisfiable at the claimed n, witnessed satisfiable at n−1. They close cells in DD26's Tables 3-13 but settle no infinite family - the sibling entries do that for the K column. The three overlap cells are Rdih(P4alt,K6)=16, Rdih(P3alt,K9)=17 and Rdih(P9alt,K3)=17, each an instance of a sibling theorem; the remain…
The a = 3 slice is settled outright. The parent conjecture's dihedral side has since been resolved for every a >= 4 as well (see the related entry), so Conjecture 4.9's claim 1 + (a-1)(b-1) now stands proved for all a >= 3; the trivial a = 1, 2 cases and the cyclic analogue for a >= 4 remain formally unaddressed.
The evenly-divided reading of WOWII Conjecture 72 holds:
⌈(A+L)/3⌉≤t,
where t= tree(G) (order of a largest induced tree), A= average eccentricity and L= maximum neighbourhood independence number.
A stronger reading that divides only L by three is false. The argument rests on two elementary observations (a diametral path is chordless and therefore induces a tre…
Answered in full: for every k≥4, a target with exactly two nonadjacent zero digits has Fk(t)=(k+23)3k−4, independently of the distance between the zeros. Exact at every width, no error term, no hypothesis on k (Theorem 1.1). This is an evaluation, not an extremal result, and the paper is explicit about the difference: the plateau value is not maximal. At k=12 it reads 35⋅38=229,635 while…
Nothing in the paper's proof is affected. At the witness, inequality (4) holds with slack +27.0, inequality (5) holds with equality (f is inner), and the theorem itself holds with slack 2 - kappa = +0.80. Only the shortcut Remark 2 floats is refuted.